Commercial non-litigation petitions are adjudicated by a panel of judges.
The provisions set forth in Chapter 2, paragraphs 1 and 3 of Article 47, and Article 48 through Article 52 of this Act apply mutatis mutandis to commercial non-litigation cases.
For commercial non-litigation cases that are filed for mediation, the provisions of Article 13 and Article 14 of the Non-litigation Act shall apply to the collection of mediation filing fees.

For cases where shareholders or companies petition the court for a ruling on the purchase price of shares, as prescribed in the provisions of the Company Act and the Business Mergers and Acquisitions Act, the court shall, before making a ruling, provide opportunities for the petitioners and the opposing parties to state their opinions. If necessary, an inspector may be appointed and ordered to examine the company's financial situation. When there are more than two shareholders, the provisions set forth in Article 41 through Article 44, Article 44-2 and Paragraph 2 of Article 401 of the Taiwan Code of Civil Procedure shall apply.
The ruling for the petition, as described in the preceding paragraph, may be appealed; the execution of the ruling shall stay, pending such interlocutory appeal.
The filing fees and the remuneration of the inspector shall be borne by the company.

In the case of the selection of a temporary administrator, as stipulated in the provisions of Subparagraph 2, Paragraph 3 of Article 2, the court shall consult the selected candidate for opinions before making a ruling.
The court shall order the company to remunerate the temporary administrator with commensurate pay, according to the nature and complexity of the affairs performed by the temporary administrator, the financial status of the company, and other such circumstances. The actual amount shall be prescribed by the court after consulting with the competent authority, the prosecutor or the stakeholders.

A request for dismissing the temporary administrator shall be in writing.
Before making such a ruling, the court shall ask for the opinions of the temporary administrator and the person petitioning for a temporary administrator, and if necessary, the opinions of other stakeholders.
In regards to the ruling on the petition, as described in the preceding paragraph, the reasons should be provided.
When the court dismisses the temporary administrator, it shall request the competent authority to cancel such a registration.

The provisions set forth in Paragraph 1 of Article 68 and paragraphs 1 through 3 of the preceding article apply mutatis mutandis to the selection of inspectors and their dismissal.