The summary proceeding in Chapter II of Part II of the Code of Administrative Litigation Proceedings shall not apply to an administrative action concerning intellectual properties.

The administrative actions prescribed in Subparagraphs 3 and 4 of Article 3 of the Intellectual Property and Commercial Court Organization Act are subject to the jurisdiction of the IPCC.
When other administrative actions are jointly initiated with the actions set forth above, or are filed in addition thereto, they shall be filed with the IPCC.
For the purposes of enforcement set forth in Paragraph 1, the IPCC may establish an enforcement bureau, request the enforcement bureau of the civil division of the district court, or request an administrative agency, to administer enforcement matters on its behalf.
An intellectual property tribunal shall rule where a debtor opposes an enforcement order assigned in the preceding paragraph.

Unless otherwise prescribed by law, an appeal or interlocutory appeal against a judgment of the IPCC may be filed with the Supreme Administrative Court.

In an administrative action concerning cancellation or revocation of a registered trademark or revocation of a patent right, the IPCC shall take into account any new evidence submitted on the same grounds for the cancellation or revocation prior to the end of the oral argument.
The competent intellectual property authority shall provide written briefs in response to the new evidence in the preceding paragraph, indicating whether arguments provided by the opposing party concerning such new evidence have merit.

The provisions of Articles 29 through 40, Article 46, Articles 51 and 52 shall apply mutatis mutandis to an administrative action concerning intellectual properties.
A judge handling intellectual property civil or criminal actions may participate in the relevant intellectual property administrative trial, to which Subparagraph 3 of Article 19 of the Code of Administrative Litigation Proceedings shall not apply.