Except as otherwise provided in the statutory law, mediation or settlement reached, or court decisions made on the substantive claims in accordance with the provisions in this Act may be used as a writ of execution.
Except as otherwise provided in the statutory law, provisions in the Compulsory Execution Act shall apply, mutatis mutandis, to compulsory execution conducted over family matters; furthermore, the administrative agencies or the social welfare authorities may provide assistance with regard to execution upon motion.

After the issuing of the writ of execution, the creditor, in addition to motioning for compulsory execution, may motion to the court for investigating the status of performance of obligations, as well as for urging the debtor to perform the obligation in full or in part.
With regard to the investigation or urging provided in the preceding paragraph, the jurisdiction to hear the proceedings belongs to the court of first instance which made the said decision or before which the said mediation or settlement was reached.
Where necessary, the court may ask a family matter investigator to conduct the said investigation or urging; it may also request another court to so conduct the investigation or urging.
The proceedings fees provided in Paragraph 1 of this Article shall be 500 New Taiwan Dollars, to be borne by the applicant. Provisions in Article 77-23, Paragraph 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall, mutatis mutandis, apply.

In urging the debtor, the court may request other courts, relevant agencies, organizations or other appropriate personnel to act in conjunction with it.
The court may, in its discretion, order the necessary proceedings fees of urging the performance of obligations to be borne jointly by both the creditor and the debtor in a certain proportion, by one of the parties by himself or herself in whole, or separately by the creditor and the debtor for the expenses they respectively incurred.