Goto Main Content
:::

Chapter Law Content

Chapter 5 Evaluation, Rewards, and Guidance
Article 23
The relevant competent authority shall set up evaluation teams to conduct regular or non-regular evaluation and guidance of any consigned school.
The evaluation referred to in the preceding paragraph may be commissioned to suitable academic institute or group. The aspects to be evaluated, evaluation method and related matters shall be made public before the evaluation, and the evaluation results shall be made public after the evaluation. Parents may be invited to offer comments when the evaluation is being conducted. The relevant competent authority may give a school that is evaluated as excellent a reward and if a school is evaluated as not meeting standards, the relevant competent authority may issue a written demand for the school to improve the situation within a given deadline and commission a follow up assessment. The relevant competent authority may order further improvements within a given deadline if the school fails to pass the follow up assessment.
The regulations governing the evaluation, and rewards referred to in the preceding paragraph, and guidance shall be prescribed by the relevant competent authority.
The relevant competent authority at each level may provide a budget allocation for subsidies for schools. The central competent authority shall prioritize subsidies based on the financial rating of the special municipality, county, or city government and the funds provided shall be allocated for specific purposes and used for specific purposes.
Article 24
If the evaluation referred to in the preceding article finds the consigned school is excellent, the relevant competent authority may give priority to continuing the commission when the period of the commission to operate the school ends.